Criterion 2- Teaching-Learning and Evaluation

Key Indicator – 2.1 Curriculum Enrichment

Key Indicator – 2.2 Catering to Student Diversity

Metric No. Description Weightage
2.2.1 The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and  organises special Programmes to cater to  differential learning needs of the student
a) Proforma created to identify slow learners/advanced learners
b) Methodology and criteria for the assessment of learning levels
15
2.2.2 Student - Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year)
a) List showing the number of students in each of the programs for the latest completed academic year across all semesters
b) Certified list of full time teachers along with the departmental affiliation in the latest completed academic year.
c) Link for additional information
15

Key Indicator – 2.3 Teaching - Learning Process

Metric No. Description Weightage
2.3.1 Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experience and teachers use ICT- enabled tools including online resources for effective teaching and learning process
a) Link for list of student –centric methods used for enhancing learning experiences
b) Link for additional information
30
2.3.2 The institution adopts effective Mentor-Mentee Schemes to address academics and student-psychological issues
a) Record of mentor-mentee
b) Details of fulltime teachers/other recognized mentors
c) Copy of circular pertaining to the details of mentor and their allotted mentees
d) List of Active mentors
e) Any additional information
10
2.3.3 Preparation and adherence of Academic Calendar and Teaching plans by the institution
a) Adherence to Academic calendar
b) Link for additional information
10

Key Indicator – 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality

Metric No. Description Weightage
2.4.1 Average percentage of full time teachers appointed against the number of sanctioned posts year wise during the last five years
a) Sanction letters indicating number of posts sanctioned by the competent authority (including Management sanctioned posts).
b) Provide the relevant information in institutional website as part of public disclosure
c) Provide Links for any other relevant document to support the claim
d) Link for additional information
15
2.4.2 Percentage of full time teachers with Ph.D./D.Sc. / D.Litt./ L.L.D during the last five years
a) List of faculty having Ph.D./D.Sc. / D.Litt./ L.L.D along with particulars of the degree awarding university, subject and the year of award per academic year.
b) Copies of Ph.D./D.Sc. / D.Litt./ L.L.D awarded by UGC recognized universities
c) Link for additional information
25
2.4.3 Average teaching experience of full time teachers (Data to be provided only for the latest completed academic year, in number of years)
a) List of full-time teachers for the preceding academic year with their designation, department and number of years of teaching experience
b) Experience certificate of full time teacher
c) Link for additional information
5
2.4.4 Percentage of full time teachers working in the institution throughout during the last five years
a) List of full-time teachers working in the institution
5

Key Indicator – 2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms

Metric No. Description Weightage
2.5.1 Average number of days from the date of last semester-end/ year- end examination till the last date of declaration of results during the last five years
a) Policy document on declaration of results
b) Result sheet with date of publication
c) Exam timetable released by the Controller of Examination
d) Link for additional information
20
2.5.2 Percentage of student complaints/grievances about evaluation against total number appeared in the examinations during the last five years
a) List of students who have applied for re- valuation/re-totaling program wise certified by the Controller of Examinations year-wise for the assessment period
b) Link for additional information
15
2.5.3 IT integration and reforms in the examination procedures and processes including Continuous Internal Assessment (CIA)/Formative Assessment have brought in considerable improvement in Examination Management System (EMS) of the Institution
a) Link for additional information
15

Key Indicator – 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes

Metric No. Description Weightage
2.6.1 The institution has stated learning outcomes  (programme and course outcome)/graduate attributes which are integrated into the assessment process and widely publicized through the website and other documents and the attainment of the same are evaluated by the institution
a) Programmes outcomes and Course Outcomes for all courses
b) Link for additional information
30
2.6.2 Pass percentage of students (excluding backlog students) (Data for the latest completed academic year)
a) Certified report from the COE indicating the pass percentage of students of the final year (final semester) eligible for the degree program-wise / year wise
b) Annual report of Controller of Examinations (COE) highlighting the pass percentage of final year students
c) Link for additional information
20

Key Indicator – 2.7 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes